Some believe permanent committees add little value and are difficult to maintain. Also, is there an element of micro-management within ongoing committees? The alternative is to have revolving committee team members – would this hurt or help a committee’s objectives? What about if a nonprofit board is in its infancy? Is this a scenario that may require permanent committees to reach objectives?
As a nonprofit association or society leader, how are your committees structured? Do you like the consistency of an ongoing committee members or do you feel changing committee members adds perspective and new ideas to completing objectives?
